When is it time to officially Stop Drafting Travis Kelce?
No, this analysis isn’t all about Travis Kelce, but it basically is since we know we are all thinking it. If you have been reading this series before for running back (click here for RB article) and wide receivers (click here for WR article) you know the drill.
1. The years sampled were 2011-2020 for the tight end position only
2. The scoring format used for this analysis is full PPR
3. The analysis benchmark we will be discussing today is 50 targets. Every tight end ages 21-37 had to have at least 50 targets to qualify
4. When conducting the analysis, it was important to have a baseline for targets as many tight ends who don’t make it typically only play 3-4 years in their early 20s…..yada yada yada we used the same veribage from the previous articles so go check them out.Â
Tight End Age Analysis
Like we always promise we will give you the high-level data first and you can take it for what it is worth. The first chart will includes the following:
Age – The tight end (TE) age for that season
Total TEs – Total tight ends (TE) who played at that age over that past 10 years
Total TEs 50 – The number of tight ends who hit 50 targets in a season
% who hit 50 – This is the percentage of tight ends who played at that age who received 50 or more targets in that season at that age
Total Points and PPG – These are the points and PPG in full PPR that these tight ends had at that age on average who hit 50 targets in a season
AGE | Total TEs | Total TEs 50 | % who hit 50 | Average of Points | Average of PPG |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
21 | 9 | 1 | 11.10% | 94.7 | 5.9 |
22 | 43 | 11 | 25.60% | 132.1 | 9 |
23 | 116 | 21 | 18.10% | 125.9 | 9.1 |
24 | 163 | 27 | 16.60% | 122.3 | 8.5 |
25 | 145 | 42 | 29.00% | 142.3 | 10 |
26 | 139 | 31 | 22.30% | 145.9 | 9.9 |
27 | 106 | 31 | 29.20% | 150.4 | 10 |
28 | 88 | 27 | 30.70% | 140.3 | 9.5 |
29 | 76 | 21 | 27.60% | 141.8 | 9.5 |
30 | 52 | 14 | 26.90% | 163 | 10.6 |
31 | 41 | 15 | 36.60% | 158.2 | 10.4 |
32 | 25 | 11 | 44.00% | 135.9 | 9.4 |
33 | 19 | 9 | 47.40% | 137.2 | 8.7 |
34 | 13 | 5 | 38.50% | 145.2 | 9.8 |
35 | 8 | 4 | 50.00% | 164 | 11.3 |
36 | 3 | 2 | 66.70% | 190.9 | 13 |
37 | 4 | 4 | 100.00% | 143.9 | 9 |