Don't be shellfish...Tweet about this on TwitterShare on FacebookShare on Google+Share on Reddit

Seriously, we’re all Vikings all the time with our sleepers around here apparently.  I touched upon Kyle Rudolph a bit ago as a 2012 sleeper and now I turn to a man whose nickname I will force you to like until I see it tweeted ad finitum.  Folks, I’m here to talk to you about Minnesota’s Valhalla Warrior, Toby Gerhart.

Now before we start this little post off, let me hear it.  But, but, but…Adrian Peterson!  There, there, I could tell by the three buts and lack of proper sentence structure you’re emotionally charged by this issue.  I know, I know your AP’s back and this post is in trouble.  Well, actually it’s not.  This sleeper post is of the variety where you should try and have your cake and eat it too.  I’m not saying I think AP is out for the year.  Far from it.  In fact, I have him at a decent spot in my 2012 fantasy football rankings to prove that I plan on seeing him back on the field eventually.  The key word in that last sentence was ‘eventually’ like how your wife will ‘eventually’ forgive you for planning a drunken camp trip with your buddies on your anniversary weekend.  The cool thing is, my eventually will probably happen sooner than yours as I see him getting back in the fold by the 5th or 6th game of the season.  Alright, so where in that type of statement is Toby a sleeper you ask?  Follow me on a magical journey to the  next paragraph to find out.

Looking back on the Vikings’ season last year, there wasn’t much good to come out of it.  Adrian was on, then off, then back on the injury list last year with the finishing blow putting the start to his 2012 campaign in serious doubt.  To compound those woes, their rookie quarterback Christian Ponder got thrown to the wolves mid-way through game 6 and never really got comfortable in the pocket.  Well, namely because there was not much of a pocket to speak of for him while he was out there.  With how the season ended, it’s no wonder very few noticed what Toby did in the trenches in AP’s stead.  In the four and a half games that Peterson couldn’t play, Toby amassed 97 total touches good for 484 yards and – ok this isn’t that special – two total touchdowns.  But lets put that in perspective.  That was only from 4 1/2 games.  If we do a little fancy fantasy football math, we realize he was on pace for 1720 all purpose yards and about 7 touchdowns given a 16 game season.  Yes, now you understand a bit more, I can tell.  To make him even more appealing, the Vikings face off against the Lions and the Colts in weeks 4 and 2, respectively, to start the year.  Those two teams were in the bottom ten in terms of rushing yards allowed.  For a running back that should start the year as a clear cut #1 in his offense, you have a great way to start the year until AP is ready to play.  Plus, let’s also face facts: we truly don’t know when or if Adrian will be back.  If the Vikings season goes south in a hurry, maybe they keep him off the field so that he’s fully healed and ready to go for 2013.  If that tragic scenario were to happen, you just drafted a possible RB2 in the 10th round.  Of course, you drafted jack-all if you took AP in the second round in that scenario but let’s not talk about the negatives here.  This is a sleeper post; dream with me!  Right now, the Fantasy Pros CheatSheetWizard tells me over 60 analysts think he’s gonna be worse than New York Giants back up David Wilson as the 44th running back off the board.  That’s enough to make any Viking go berserk, even if it’s only for four or five games.

2012 Projections: 810 rushing yards, 30 receptions, 240 receiving yards and 7 total touchdowns

  1. Tony Starks says:
    (link)

    thanks for the article unnamed razzball writer. but i’m curious about the rankings. i went to look at these upon seeing you link them so the reader could take a look at where AP was ranked and am now wondering why these don’t get updated. i mean most of these rankings were done over a month ago, right? doesn’t make much sense for someone to be coming to your site to see ryan matthews ranked 5th and trent richardson at 8th. and for some reason you guys have shonn greene in the top 20?! that is insanity plea crazy

    please let me know if razzball has any plans on updating these rankings. thank you

    TS

    • Sky

      Sky says:
      (link)

      Was on a pre-planned vacation that couldn’t be changed when all the ruckus occurred. Plan on getting re-rankings in an easy to edit form up hopefully today if not then tomorrow. The AP story I have a hard time buying and it worries me. We need him fully healthy at the end of the season and I hope it’s not jeopardized by starting too early. RB is an act of attrition this year; if the guy is declared the starter, he’s gotta get recognized.

      PS, real question: you called me unnamed writer. Is Sky not showing up? Should be.

      • A Hill O' Beans says:
        (link)

        @Sky, I can answer your question at the end of your comment, because I’ve always found it a little strange.

        For some reason on Razzball (Football/Baseball/etc) when you are on the home page you can see the author of the articles, but when you are on the actual article page, after clicking the link, there is no author shown.

        When I first started reading Razzball it confused me to no end how everyone knew the authors names even though it didn’t say who the author was. Then I realized it says it if looking on the home page where all posts are listed.

        • Sky

          Sky says:
          (link)

          Oh man, I didn’t know that. That really is confusing. I’ll check in with Grey/Rudy see if they’re aware. Prolly are but would be good to bounce it off them. Thanks!

      • Tony Starks says:
        (link)

        @Sky, it comes up when you respond to comments but does not appear next to your 1860′s pic that is linked to each article. But thanks for getting back and keep up the good work. Sky’s the limit!

        • Sky

          Sky says:
          (link)

          Not a problem and thanks Iron Man! Oops, can I call you that, Mr. Starks?

Comments are closed.