| Period | Accuracy | Rank | High | Low | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Week 3 | 59.1% | 18 out of 134 | 65.0% | 42.1% | Top 15% |
| Week 2 | 53.4% | 85 out of 135 | 65.2% | 46.2% | Top 65% |
| Week 1 | 56.8% | 54 out of 137 | 62.8% | 46.3% | Top 40% |
| 2015 | 56.4% | 34 out of 132 | 60.8% | 48.0% | Top 30% |
| 2014 | 58.1% | 31 out of 125 | 60.7% | 50.6% | Top 25% |
As the title states (as do the numbers) we are back to kicking ass and chewing bubble gum. And boy am I out of bubble gum. In last week’s rankings post, I mentioned that we would be putting forth a new process for ranking players (or I guess in this case, returning to my original process), and the results were telling. Small sample size (that’s what she said) will always been an issue, but I think the numbers produced were promising, and I’ll be keeping with the same methodology to better serve your Fantasy Football Teams. Here are your Week 4 Rankings…
New to Daily Fantasy Football? Try out this new free FanDuel’s contest, where half the league is guaranteed to win. (Played on FanDuel before? You can build a team for $5 for a chance of $100,000, part of a one million dollar prize pool!)
