2016 Rankings:Â Top-200Â (Standard)Â | Top-200 (Half-PPR) | Top-200 (PPR) | QB |Â RBÂ (Standard) | RB (Half-PPR) |Â RB (PPR) | WRÂ (Standard) | WR (Half-PPR) |Â WR (PPR) | TE (Standard) | TE (Half-PPR) |Â TE (PPR) | K | DST
Dynasty Rankings: Top-150 | QB | RB | WR | TE | Top-50 Rookies
| Year | Accuracy | Rank | High | Low | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 57.5% | 22 out of 123 | 59.9% | 51.6% | Top 20% |
| 2014 | 58.1% | 31 out of 125 | 60.7% | 50.6% | Top 25% |
Welcome to the second part of receiver rankings, where we here at Razzball put the PP in PPR. Wait, what? As stated in the standard receiver rankings, I find this position the hardest, though your mom never complains. ICE BURN. Just the sheer volume of names combined with the fact that your standard roster size requires at least three to four of them, well, you now know what’s going on in my general vicinity. And if you’re that close, WATCH OUT, for you will like love the cut of this jib. Because I guess it’s 40’s throwback vernacular Tuesday.Puts on fedora, winks, begins to swing dance. So let’s go ahead and begin the great quest to put our PP in PPR (there’s gotta be a better way to say that) and get to the rankings… (wearing pants is optional, but frowned upon in this establishment.)
