2016 Rankings:Â Top-200Â (Standard)Â | Top-200 (Half-PPR) | Top-200 (PPR) | QB |Â RBÂ (Standard) | RB (Half-PPR) |Â RB (PPR) | WRÂ (Standard) | WR (Half-PPR) |Â WR (PPR) | TE (Standard) | TE (Half-PPR) |Â TE (PPR) | K | DST
Dynasty Rankings: Top-150 | QB | RB | WR | TE | Top-50 Rookies
| Year | Accuracy | Rank | High | Low | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 57.5% | 22 out of 123 | 59.9% | 51.6% | Top 20% |
| 2014 | 58.1% | 31 out of 125 | 60.7% | 50.6% | Top 25% |
As stated in the 2016 Tight Ends Rankings for leagues that use standard scoring, or “O.G. scoring”, as we Tupac fans like to call it, I established that we were entering into the “sexual innuendo zone”. I mean, it wasn’t exactly a “zone”, but you get my drift. (Not the one from Tokyo for those wondering.) I mean, c’mon, tight ends… the possibilities are… endless? Ahtankyouvermuch. So yeah, here are the tight end rankings for PPR leagues. And while everything I addressed for standard leagues still generally applies here, you’ll definitely see some movement of players, based on their value from receptions or the lack thereof…
